The Cycle of the Werewolf is actually the first ever writing
I have read by Stephen King. As far as an introduction to the author goes, Stephen
King to me is alright. I wouldn’t put him up there with J.K. Rowling for popular
authors, because I don’t think he deserves all the hype and fame he has.
However, his writing is at least clean and entertaining when the plot isn’t
dragging.
Now, I have some experience with King, just not in text
form. I know the movie The Shining, and I know the play Carrie. Both of these I
found interesting. The Cycle of the Werewolf, being the first novel I’ve read
of his, did not hold up to those standards. It wasn’t terrible, but I had high
expectations going in, and those expectations were not met. I was let down.
The book fell into two categories for me:
Good chapters- Jan, Mar, Apr, June, Aug, Oct, Nov, Dec
Bad chapters- Feb, May, July, Sept
We just discussed a chapter in Writer’s Workshop of Horrors (WWoH)
on tone and writing style. I can’t say one way or another if this is normal for
King’s tone, but I feel like the fact that the chapters jump between good and
bad makes me feel like the writing style is very inconsistent. In some chapters
there are beautiful phrases, rhetorical elements, and interesting plot twists.
In others, the scenes drag on, the word choices are cliché, and the prose is
too repetitive. The chapters are all over the place.
Now, some of the clichés work for me, such as the end of the
very first chapter of the book. “—it is all black winter and dark ice. The
cycle of the Werewolf has begun,” may be a bit cheesy, but it’s also a nice way
to incorporate the title of the book into the story. However, other examples
don’t work for me at all, such as, “Love, Stella Randolph thinks, lying in her
narrow virgin's bed…” or the repetitive, “’You always get what you want! Just
because you're a cripple!’"
The story really picks up after the first survival of a victim
(during July). Even though I thought the chapter July drug on too long before
getting to evening, it did a good job of setting up the story for the later recurrence
of those characters. I understand the importance of having the previous murders
by the werewolf mentioned for build-up, but this book should have started in
June. That’s the chapter when a victim first sees the person change under the
moonlight, and then the chapter after that is when we get the ‘main’ character
of Marty introduced and survives. All the earlier chapters are either irrelevant
information to build up to a murder, or boring dialog of townsfolk talking
about the werewolf. IT IS BORING.
That would be my summary of the book too. Even the end of the
book, where I enjoyed the chapters, still drug on too long. I felt like there
was too much unnecessary exposition and descriptions. I didn’t, but I wanted to
skim.
Verdict: Skip the first 30% of the book. Or else, the pacing
is better for a movie script instead.