First of all, let me say
props to this small Youtuber I found trying to do voice acting. This playlist
made the voices of the different chapters even more memorable.
The book, while being about zombies,
was more so a story on humans, our ability to cope (and hide) tragedy, quell
panic, how societies interact and how the government involves itself. And despite
the zombies, this also wasn’t a horror book to me. This was a commentary on
mankind being the monsters more than it was a terrifying undead book.
Here, we see people spanning multiple
locations around the world, and how the cultures handle the pandemic
differently. The bigger issue than the zombies in this book were the surviving
humans undermining one another. The whole books was brimming with political and
personal agendas of unreliable narrators, and yet that’s what made it so good. The
story pieced into interviews worked for me. It helped break up the story into palatable
chunks, and worked much better than telling everything from the biased POV of
one character only. Needless to say though, this books is about human reaction
and interaction, not the undead. This book actually gave me Jurassic Park
vibes, as weird as that is to say. It felt like the world was ignoring the
threat or assuming they could keep it contained.
Now, I don’t remember a single
character name, but I remember stories. It may be because I listened to the
book rather than read it, but the character voices were so distinct. Thos
voices are what got me through the book. I clearly remember the doctor with
patient zero, the man smuggling in organs across borders, the greedy guy making
money off false vaccination hope, the woman in the hospital with the mental
state of a young child. All of them were different, and (almost) all of them
were interesting.
However, I have to agree with Sean
that the story being told in the past tense did ruin the tension. We knew all
the people being interviewed survived. these drawbacks in tense drew me back
from really enjoying this story. And the fact that the zombies weren’t as prevalent
as I wanted them to be. This book was about humans, and I was let down by that,
going in expecting more. The book did eventually become monotonous with tales of
everyone dying and then the survivors finding a way to live high above and
survive. It’s about human resilience, and readers always eat that up because
they like seeing the person they emphasize with win in the end. But I say
again, I can’t remember a single character name, so it’s hard to relate to
characters. Not only that, but a lot of the character I felt like we weren’t
supposed to like, and that’s why I enjoyed them. A good bad villain is hard to
not love.
In the end, I have already recommended
this to my sister, who at one point wanted to be an epidemiologist, but is now
a medical anthropologist.
Medical anthropology? Wow that is a new one on me. Very interesting. I cannot remember any character names either. I am going to have to go back to my local library and scan the book to see if there were even names assigned. As a little time has passed now since I read WWZ, I am becoming more fond of the scale but still find the overall experience totally unfulfilling like reading a dry WW2 history.
ReplyDeleteYeah, she is studying about how aids and women's health in sub-Saharan Africa influences a community, and all the cultural jazz around it rather than the medical implications.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad I wasn't the only one who didn't think this was a good example of horror. I mean, if well-described gore is all that's needed to qualify, I guess this book can. But when I think of horror, I think of a scary, can't turn the next page, have to pause the movie kind of vibe. This book certainly wasn't that.
ReplyDeleteI want to be scared!